![]() ![]() Simplistic explanation is there is a bug in alder lake CPUs where if an overclock fails it will revert to previous safe settings but still report the failed overclock values, which can allow you to validate at much higher clock speed than the CPU is actually running at. It certainly raised a red flag when Gigabyte started promoting its 8 GHz overclock on social media and in a press release. As a matter of fact, many processors struggle to get to 7.5 GHz, and overclockers were one-upping each other by a few MHz at best. Apparently, 7 GHz on all cores is possible, however, the ceiling for single-core overclocks ranges from 7.5 GHz to 7.6 GHz. In some cases, the internal CPU PLL fails to stick, so it remains at the previously configured ratio while still reporting the new one.ĭoc TB has since provided some statistics on Alder Lake overclocking. Apparently, a silicon errata exists with the ratio when set above 63. The developer believes that Intel's new flagship Alder Lake likely didn't hit 8 GHz at all.Īccording to the developer, the team started to see fake overclocks spanning from 8 GHz to 12 GHz on early Alder Lake samples. Twitter user Doc TB, the person who developed the CPU-Z Validator, has debunked Gigabyte's 8 GHz world record with Intel's Core i9-12900K processor. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |